Preclinical Image Quality Evaluation of Simultaneous Vision Intraocular Lenses / 中国医疗器械杂志

Three different preclinical evaluation methods of MTF through-frequency response, MTF through-focus-response and expected visual acuity were used to compare and analyze the imaging differences of IOLs with four different optical designs. The research work could be used in the simultaneous vision IOLs in the optical design stage and verify the optical quality of the IOLs, the results can predict the visual representation of the patients better. The evaluation results can provide reference for IOL manufacturers and users in product design, development, validation and application selection.

Scleral fixation of iris-Intraocular lens complex (Reper®) with Canabrava double-flanged technique: a case report / Fixação escleral de um complexo íris-lente intraocular (Reper®) com técnica de flange duplo de Canabrava: relato de caso

ABSTRACT A 38-year-old patient who developed aphakia and aniridia secondary to trauma suffered from vision loss. To improve her vision, an iris-intraocular lens complex (Reper®) was fixed to the sclera with Canabrava's double-flanged technique. There was a satisfactory increase in the patient's visual acuity and no complications were observed during the 6-months follow-up. Canabrava technique simplifies and improves the fixation of the iris-intraocular lens complex to the sclera. It is a safe option that does not require scleral flaps or knots.

RESUMO Uma paciente de 38 anos desenvolveu afacia e ani­ridia secundárias a um trauma, levando à perda da visão. Para melhorar sua visão, um complexo de íris e lente intraocular (Reper®) foi fixado à esclera com a técnica de flange duplo de Canabrava. Houve um aumento satisfatório na acuidade visual do paciente e nenhuma complicação foi observada durante o acompanhamento de 6 meses. A técnica de Canabrava simplifica e melhora a fixação do complexo de íris e lente intraocular na esclera. É uma opção segura que não requer retalhos ou pontos esclerais.

Research progress in optimizing implantable collamer lens V4c implantation / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

With the development of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses implantation and the constant improvement of the implantable collamer lens(ICL), ICL V4c implantation has become one of the main methods for correcting moderate and high myopia. Vault is an important indicator to evaluate the security of posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. In recent years, optimizing surgical procedures to obtain the ideal vault in ICL V4c implantation surgery has become a research hotspot. This paper aims to provide help for improving surgical safety by summarizing and analyzing the optimized programs of ICL V4c implantation surgery. The focus will be on preoperative examination, intraoperative surgical design, and postoperative follow-up.

Lentes intraoculares en pilotos aviadores: revisión del tema / Intraocular lenses in pilots: a review

Resumen Objetivo: Revisar en la literatura las diferentes posturas de las agencias reguladoras de la aviación sobre la implantación de lentes intraoculares multifocales (MIOLs) en pilotos aviadores civiles que han desarrollado catarata, además de evidencia científica que podría generar una revisión de los lineamientos vigentes. Resultados: Se encontraron el 50% (3 de 6) de agencias revisadas con postura en contra de los MIOLs. Además, se revisaron dos estudios a favor de los MIOLs, en el que implantarlos brinda una mayor independencia de lentes respecto a los monofocales para las tareas visuales dentro y fuera de la cabina, así como un rendimiento sin diferencias en simuladores de vuelo versus los pilotos con lentes intraoculares monofocales. Limitaciones: Existen pocos estudios de MIOLs en pilotos aviadores. Originalidad: No se ha reportado ninguna revisión de las agencias reguladoras respecto a la prohibición o permisión de los MIOLs en pilotos aviadores, tocando evidencia que pudiera consolidar una postura unánime respecto a este tema, como en su momento fue la cirugía refractiva con láser excimer que actualmente no está restringida.

Abstract Objective: To review the literature on the different stands of aviation regulatory agencies on the implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) in civilian aviators who have developed cataract, as well as scientific evidence that could generate a revision of the current guidelines. Results: 50% (3 of 6) of agencies reviewed were found to be against MIOLs. In addition, two studies were reviewed in favour of MIOLs, in which implanting MIOLs provides greater lens independence from monofocals for visual tasks in and out of the cockpit, as well as no difference in performance in flight simulators versus pilots with monofocal intraocular lenses. Limitations: There are few studies of MIOLs in aviator pilots. Originality: No review of regulatory agencies regarding the prohibition or permission of MIOLs in airline pilots has been reported, touching on evidence that could consolidate a unanimous position on this issue, as was once the case with excimer laser refractive surgery, which is currently unrestricted.

Influence of pupillary dynamics on the defocus curve of eyes implanted with diffractive multifocal lenses: a randomized study / Influência da dinâmica pupilar na curva de desfoco de olhos implantados com lentes multifocais difrativas: um estudo randomizado

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the influence of pupil dynamics on the defocus profile and area-of-focus of eyes implanted with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: This prospective randomized trial was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Brazil. Thirty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive the multifocal SN6AD1 (n=20) or the aspheric monofocal SN60WF (aIOL) (n=18) IOLs bilaterally. Dynamic pupillometry, visual acuity for distance and near, corrected and uncorrected, and a defocus profile were assessed postoperatively. The area-of-focus was calculated using an empirical polynomial model of the defocus profile. Results: Sixteen patients (32 eyes) in the multifocal SN6AD1 group and 17 patients (34 eyes) in the aspheric monofocal SN60WF group completed the 1-year follow-up. There were no significant between-group differences in monocular uncorrected distance or near visual acuity. The defocus profiles of the mfIOL group showed a double peak, whereas those of the aspheric monofocal SN60WF group showed only one peak, which is typical for a monofocal intraocular lens. The area-of-focus of the aIOL group (4.66 ± 1.51 logMARxD) was significantly different from that of the multifocal SN6AD1 (1.99 ± 1.31 logMARxD). Pupil size at maximum contraction after exposure to a flash of 30 cd/m2 for 1 second was significantly correlated with a better area-of-focus in the multifocal SN6AD1 group (r=0.54; p=0.0017), whereas this was not the case in the aspheric monofocal SN60WF group. Conclusion: These findings indicate that in eyes implanted with an multifocal SN6AD1, the smaller the pupil size, the better is the area-of-focus and hence the better is the visual performance. This correlation was not found for the aspheric monofocal SN60WF.(AU)

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a influência da dinâmica pupilar na curva de desfoco de olhos implantados com lente intraoculares multifocais difrativas. Métodos: Estudo prospectivo e randomizado realizado na Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Universidade de São Paulo - Departamento de Oftalmologia. Trinta e oito pacientes foram aleatoriamente designados para receber bilateralmente lentes intraoculares SN6AD1 (n=20) (mfIOL) ou SN60WF (n=18) (aIOL). Além da acuidade visual para longe e perto, corrigida e não corrigida, e curva de desfoco, foi ainda realizada pupilometria dinâmica. A área sob a curva de desfoco foi calculada usando um modelo polinomial empírico. Resultados: Um total de 16 e 17 pacientes (n=32 e 34 olhos) completaram 1 ano de seguimento nos grupos mfIOL e aIOL, respectivamente. Não houve diferenças significativas entre grupos para as acuidades visuais seja para longe ou perto. As curvas de desfoco do grupo mfIOL mostraram um pico duplo; enquanto o SN60WF mostrou apenas um pico, típico para uma lente intraoculares monofocal. A média da área sob a curva de desfoco do grupo aIOL foi (4,66 ± 1,51 logMAR.dp), e essa é estatisticamente significante diferente da métrica do grupo mfIOL (1,99 ± 1,31 logMAR.dp). A pupila na contração máxima após a exposição a um flash de 30 cd/m2 por 1 segundo foi significativamente correlacionada com uma melhor área de foco no grupo mfIOL (r=0,54; p=0,0017), essa relação não foi observada para o grupo aIOL. Conclusão: Estes dados indicam que quanto menor a pupila durante contração, melhor é a área sob a curva de desfoco e, portanto, o desempenho visual dos olhos implantados com essa mfIOL. Esta correlação não foi encontrada para lentes intraoculares monofocais.(AU)

Effects of visual restoration on dynamic plantar pressure features in elder individuals / 北京大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the effects of visual restoration after cataract surgery on plantar pressure and biomechanics of foot in elder individuals.@*METHODS@#Thirty-two patients [male/female 5/27, (70.1±5.2) years old] with age-related cataract were recruited between October 2016 and December 2019. The footscan system was employed to record the data of plantar pressure during level walking before and 1-month after the cataract surgery. Parameters of peak pressure (PP), impulse (I), pressure-time integral (PTI) and time to peak pressure (TPP) from the regions of the 1st toe (T1), 2nd to 5th toes (T2-5), 1st to 5th metatarsal heads (M1-M5), midfoot (MF), medial hindfoot (HM) and lateral hindfoot (HL) were analyzed respectively.@*RESULTS@#Post-operatively, the visual function was effectively reconstructed with improved visual acuity in both eyes (Z=-4.878, -4.801; P < 0.001). The PP (t=2.266, P=0.031) and I (t=2.152, P=0.039) values in M2 region on the dominant side (right foot) increased statistically at post-operative phase, while the changes of pressure and temporal para-meters in other regions remained stable. There was laterality in plantar pressure at pre-operative phase, manifested as greater PP values in M1, M2, MF, and HM regions on the dominant sides (t=-2.414, -2.478, -2.144, -5.269; P < 0.05), greater PP values in T1, M3, M5 and HL regions on the non-dominant sides (t=4.830, 3.155, 2.686, 3.683; P < 0.05), greater I values in M1, MF, and HM regions on the dominant sides (t=-2.380, -2.185, -5.320; P < 0.05) and greater I values in T1, M3, M5 and HL regions on the non-dominant sides (t=4.489, 2.247, 2.838, 3.992; P < 0.05). post-operatively, the pressure tended to be compatible between the two sides in regions of M3 and MF, while the magnitude of laterality in regions of M1 (ZPP△= -2.721, P=0.007; ZI△=-2.581, P=0.010), M2 (ZPP△=-2.674, P=0.007; ZI△=-2.375, P=0.018) and M5 (ZPP△=1.991, P=0.046; ZI△=2.150, P=0.032) was further increased.@*CONCLUSION@#Changes in plantar pressure after cataract surgery were characterized as increased pressure in the 2nd metatarsal head area on the dominant side. Visual restoration might intensify the laterality in the medial of forefoot on the dominant side and the lateral of forefoot on the non-dominant side.

Capsulotomía posterior en el Hospital General Docente Dr. Agostinho Neto, Guantánamo 2015-2019 / Capsulotomia posterior no Hospital General Docente Dr. Agostinho Neto / Capsulotomy outcomes at the Hospital General Docente Dr. Agostinho Neto

Introducción: La opacificación de la cápsula posterior continúa siendo la complicación posoperatoria tardía más frecuente tras la cirugía de catarata. Objetivo: Determinar los resultados visuales en la realización de la capsulotomía posterior con el equipo NIDEK YAG C-1800 a 75 pacientes que desarrollaron opacidad de la cápsula posterior (150 ojos); los cuales asistieron al Centro Oftalmológico del Hospital General Docente "Dr. Agostinho Neto", provincia Guantánamo, en el período comprendido entre abril de 2015 a abril de 2019. Método: Se efectuó un estudio longitudinal, prospectivo y descriptivo en pacientes diagnosticados con opacidad de la cápsula posterior, a los cuales se les realizó capsulotomía posterior en dicho centro antes mencionado. Las variables estudiadas fueron: edad, sexo, agudeza visual corregida con cristales (AV.cc) a los tres meses posteriores a la cirugía y complicaciones encontradas. Resultados: El 57,3 % presentó una edad mayor a los 75 años, el sexo femenino quedó representado en un 62 %. La metaplasia fibrosa con un 57,3 % fue la opacidad de cápsula posterior más frecuente después de la aplicación del láser y el 74,7 % de los pacientes evolucionó con una buena agudeza visual, mayor o igual a 0,6. La complicación más frecuente fue la elevación transitoria de la tensión ocular con un 32,7 %. Conclusiones: La capsulotomía posterior con NIDEK YAG C-1800 demuestra ser un procedimiento quirúrgico efectivo en los pacientes diagnosticados con opacidad de la cápsula posterior, la mayoría de los pacientes alcanzó una agudeza visual mayor a 0,5. Existieron pocas complicaciones relacionadas con el proceder.

Introduction: The opacification of the posterior capsule remains the most frequent late postoperative complication following cataract surgery. Objective: To determine the visual outcomes obtained in the performance of posterior capsulotomy with the NIDEK YAG C-1800 equipment in 75 patients with opacification of the posterior capsule (150 eyes) who were attended in the Ophthalmology Center setted at the Hospital General Docente "Dr. Agostinho Neto" in Guantánamo, from April 2015 to April 2019. Method: A longitudinal, prospective and descriptive study was carried out in patients diagnosed with posterior capsule opacity, who underwent posterior capsulotomy in the aforementioned center. Variables studied were as follow: age, sex, visual acuity corrected with glasses (VA.cc) (3 months after surgery), and complications encountered. Results: The 57.3% of the total were over 75 years of age, and 62% were female. Fibrous metaplasia was the most frequent posterior capsule opacity found after laser application (57.3%) and the 74.7% of patients evolved with good visual acuity (≥0,6). The most frequent complication was transient elevation of ocular pressure (32.7%). Conclusions: Posterior capsulotomy with NIDEK YAG C-1800 proved to be effective, as surgical procedure, in patients diagnosed with posterior capsule opacity, most patients achieved visual acuity over 0.5. There were minimum complications related to the procedure.

Introdução: A opacificação da cápsula posterior continua sendo a complicação pós-operatória tardia mais frequente após a cirurgia de catarata. Objetivo: Determinar os resultados visuais na realização da capsulotomia posterior com o equipamento NIDEK YAG C-1800 em 75 pacientes que desenvolveram opacidade da cápsula posterior (150 olhos); que frequentaram o Centro Oftalmológico do Hospital General Docente "Dr. Agostinho Neto", província de Guantánamo, no período de abril de 2015 a abril de 2019. Método: Foi realizado um estudo longitudinal, prospectivo e descritivo em pacientes com diagnóstico de opacidade da cápsula posterior, submetidos à capsulotomia posterior no referido centro. As variáveis estudadas foram: idade, sexo, acuidade visual corrigida por cristal (AV.cc) três meses após a cirurgia e complicações encontradas. Resultados: 57,3% tinham mais de 75 anos, o sexo feminino estava representado em 62%. Metaplasia fibrosa com 57,3% foi a opacidade da cápsula posterior mais frequente após a aplicação do laser e 74,7% dos pacientes evoluíram com boa acuidade visual, maior ou igual a 0,6. A complicação mais frequente foi a elevação temporária da tensão ocular com 32,7%. Conclusões: A capsulotomia posterior com NIDEK YAG C-1800 se mostra um procedimento cirúrgico eficaz em pacientes com diagnóstico de opacidade da cápsula posterior, a maioria dos pacientes alcançou acuidade visual maior que 0,5. Houve poucas complicações relacionadas ao procedimento.

Lentes intraoculares fácicas para miopia e astigmatismo: revisão prospectiva / Phakic intraocular lenses for myopia and astigmatism: a prospective review

RESUMO O implante de lentes intraoculares fácicas com finalidade refrativa é uma alternativa cirúrgica eletiva segura e eficiente. Essa opção deve ser considerada de forma eletiva para tratar ametropias, nos casos em que as cirurgias de correção visual refrativa a laser na córnea apresentam maior risco de complicações, seja por características da córnea ou pela magnitude da ametropia. Este artigo traz uma revisão prospectiva das lentes fácicas disponíveis no mercado brasileiro em 2020 e suas características.

ABSTRACT Implantation of phakic intraocular lenses for refractive purpose is a safe and efficient elective surgical alternative. This option should be considered to electively treat ametropia when laser corneal refractive surgery has higher risk of complications, either due to corneal characteristics or the magnitude of ametropia. This article provides a prospective review of the phakic lenses available in the Brazilian market in 2020 and their characteristics.

Influence of three kinds of intraocular lens on vision and visual quality of patients with age-related cataract / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

@#AIM: To analyze the influence of trifocal lens(AT LISA tri 839MP), Lenstec SBL-3 intraocular lens(IOL)and T SPHERIS 209M monofocal IOL implantation on vision and visual quality of patients with age-related cataract(ARC). <p>METHODS: Totally 114 patients(114 eyes)with ARC undergoing elective surgical treatment in the hospital between October 2018 and April 2019 were enrolled in the prospective clinical study. They were divided into LISA tri group, SBL group and monofocal group with 38 cases(38 eyes)in each group. They were treated with trifocal IOL(AT LISA tri 839MP), Lenstec SBL-3 IOL and CT SPHERIS 209M monofocal IOL, respectively. The corneal endothelium, vision and visual quality before operation and 3mo after operation were compared. <p>RESULTS:Three months after operation, no significant changes in corneal endothelial cell density(ECD), central corneal thickness(CCT)and the proportion of hexagonal cells in the three groups compared with preoperation(<i>P</i>>0.05), while the uncorrected distance visual acuity(UCDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity(UCIVA)and uncorrected near visual acuity(UCNVA)were significantly improved(<i>P</i><0.001). UCDVA, UCIVA and UCNVA of LISA tri group were(0.11±0.03)LogMAR,(0.17±0.05)and(0.09±0.02), which of SBL group were(0.12±0.02, 0.19±0.05, 0.08±0.02), all significantly better than(0.21±0.04, 0.24±0.07, 0.15±0.03)in monofocal group(<i>P</i><0.05). 3mo after operation, the near off-glasses rate and visual satisfaction in LISA tri group were 92% and 97%, which in SBL group were 95% and 92%, all significantly higher than 66% and 68% in monofocal group(<i>P</i><0.017). Compared with preoperation, the visual function and quality of life(VF-QOL)scores of the three groups significantly increased(<i>P</i><0.001), which were significantly higher in LISA tri group and SBL group than in monofocal group(<i>P</i><0.05). <p>CONCLUSION: Trifocal IOL(AT LISA tri-839MP)and Lenstec SBL-3 multifocal IOL implantation is superior to monofocal IOL in the treatment of patients with ARC, which can effectively improve vision and visual quality.

Laser topoguiado como redutor de aberrações ópticas pós ceratotomia radial e LIO multifocal / Topoguided laser as a reducer of optical aberrations after radial keratotomy and multifocal LIO

Resumo A cirurgia de catarata com implante de lente intra-ocular é uma das cirurgias mais realizadas no mundo e, atualmente, os pacientes que se submetem a essa cirurgia podem utilizar o implante com lente intraocular (LIO) multifocal como alternativa ao uso de óculos. Um grande desafio para o cirurgião são os pacientes já submetidos previamente a ceratotomia radial (RK), pois além de terem um cálculo biométrico mais desafiador, apresentam importantes aberrações ópticas corneanas, sendo uma contra-indicação para o uso de lentes multifocais para a maioria dos oftalmologistas. Neste artigo, relatamos o caso de uma paciente que foi submetida, na juventude, a uma RK e passou a referir importante incômodo visual após a correção de catarata com facectomia e implante de LIO multifocal. Esta paciente foi submetida a uma ceratectomia fotorrefrativa (PRK) para diminuir as irregularidades da córnea com boa evolução clínica e resultado visual satisfatório. Esse caso chama a atenção para a alternativa do excimer laser topoguiado em casos semelhantes e alerta para o risco do uso desse tipo de lente em córneas irregulares.

Abstract Cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in the world and, currently, patients who undergo this surgery can use the multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implant as an alternative to wearing glasses. A great challenge for the surgeon are patients who have previously undergone radial keratotomy (RK), because in addition to having a more challenging biometric calculation, they also have important corneal optical aberrations, being a contraindication for the use of multifocal lenses for most patients. ophthalmologists. In this article, we report the case of a patient who underwent a RK in her youth and started to report an important visual discomfort after cataract correction with facectomy and multifocal IOL implantation. This patient underwent a photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to reduce corneal irregularities with good clinical evolution and satisfactory visual result. This case draws attention to the alternative of topography-guided laser excimer in similar cases and warns of the risk of using this type of lens in irregular corneas.

Astigmatismo y cirugía de catarata / Astigmatism and cataract surgery

RESUMEN La catarata es la primera causa de ceguera curable en el mundo y se produce por la opacidad del cristalino, con una disminución gradual, lenta y progresiva de la agudeza visual. La cirugía para extraer el cristalino es la única forma de curar esta discapacidad visual. La facoemulsificación ha evolucionado con el fin de lograr su perfección y el objetivo de restablecer la visión de los pacientes con la mayor calidad y cantidad en el menor tiempo posible. El desarrollo científico ha estado encaminado a controlar o eliminar el astigmatismo preoperatorio o inducido por la cirugía, y para esto se ha incluido en la actualidad el empleo de los lentes intraoculares trifocales flexibles tóricos y las incisiones menores a dos milímetros en la córnea clara, así como las incisiones relajantes limbares, las incisiones opuestas en la córnea clara, la cirugía refractiva fotoablativa y el láser de femtosegundo. Para lograr un resultado refractivo en la cirugía de catarata es imprescindible minimizar al máximo el astigmatismo inducido por el procedimiento. Este éxito se logra con un estudio personalizado preoperatorio exhaustivo, que permita satisfacer las necesidades visuales del paciente y su reincorporación temprana a sus tareas. De ahí la motivación para realizar una búsqueda de los últimos diez años de diversos artículos publicados, con el objetivo de describir los principios para evaluar el astigmatismo medio inducido posterior a la cirugía del cristalino, y su repercusión en la calidad visual y de vida de los pacientes. Se utilizó la plataforma google, específicamente la Biblioteca Virtual de Salud, con todos sus buscadores(AU)

ABSTRACT Cataract is the leading cause of curable blindness worldwide. It results from opacity of the crystalline lens with gradual, slow and progressive visual acuity reduction. Surgery for removal of the crystalline lens is the only cure for this visual impairment. Phacoemulsification technique has evolved to achieve perfection and the aim of restoring patients' vision with the greatest quality and quantity in the shortest possible time. Scientific development has been aimed at either controlling or eliminating preoperative or surgically induced astigmatism. To achieve this aim, recent inclusion has been made of the use of flexible toric trifocal intraocular lenses and minor incisions at two millimeters in the clear cornea, as well as limbal relaxing incisions, opposite incisions in the clear cornea, photoablative refractive surgery and femtosecond laser. To obtain a good refractive result in cataract surgery it is indispensable to minimize the astigmatism induced by the procedure. Such success is accomplished through an exhaustive personalized preoperative study allowing to meet the visual needs of patients and their early reincorporation to daily activities. Hence the motivation to conduct a search of a variety of papers published in the last ten years with the purpose of describing the principles applied to evaluate mean induced astigmatism after crystalline lens surgery and its effect on the patients' visual acuity and quality of life. Use was made of the Google platform, particularly the Virtual Health Library with all its search engines(AU)

Comparing the postoperative refractive predictability of Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 500 after a multifocal intraocular lens implantation / Comparação da previsibilidade refrativa pós-operatória do Pentacam HR e IOLMaster 500 após implante de lentes intraoculares multifocais

ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare the postoperative refractive predictability of IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam HR on the basis of keratometry and anterior chamber depth values in eyes with an indication for multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted on 118 eyes treated with phacoemulsification and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Only the eyes that achieved emmetropia in the dynamic refraction performed on postoperative day 30 were included. Haigis' formula was used in each case to calculate the intraocular lens power, and the intraocular lens with the target refraction closest to emmetropia was implanted. Four lens calculation scenarios were tested by combining keratometry and anterior chamber depth measurements obtained using the two devices. Results: IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam HR differed with regard to mean keratometry (D 0.07 ± 0.03 D; p=0.0065) and anterior chamber depth (D 0.08 ± 0.01 mm; p<0.001). In the analysis of covariance, the following differences were obtained using the Haigis' formula when confronted with the biometric values obtained by inserting keratometry and anterior chamber depth values, respectively: Penta/IOL x IOL/Penta (0.13 ± 0.03; p<0.0001); Penta/Penta × IOL/Penta (0.13 ± 0.03; p<0.0001); Penta/IOL × IOL/IOL (0.11 ± 0.03; p=0.001); Penta/Penta × IOL/IOL (0.11 ± 0.03; p=0.002); IOL/IOL × IOL/Penta (0.02 ± 0.03; p=0.865); and Penta/IOL × Penta/Penta (0.002 ± 0.03; p=0.99). The difference was smaller when measuring the anterior chamber depth using the IOLMaster 500, regardless of which device was used to measure keratometry. Conclusions: Pentacam HR significantly differed from IOLMaster 500 when calculating keratometry. As regards the anterior chamber depth, the two devices were equally accurate.

RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a previsibilidade refrativa pós-operatória do IOLMaster 500 e Pentacam HR com base nos valores de ceratometria e profundidade de câmara anterior nos olhos com indicação de implante de lentes intraoculares multifocais. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo realizado em 118 olhos tratados com facoemulsificação e implante de lentes intraoculares multifocal. Apenas os olhos que atingiram a emetropia na refração dinâmica no 30º dia pós-operatório foram incluídos. A fórmula de Haigis foi usada em cada caso para calcular o poder das lentes intraoculares, e a lente intraocular com a refração alvo mais próxima da emetropia foi implantada. Cenários de cálculo de quatro lentes foram testados pela combinação de medidas de ceratometria e profundidade de câmara anterior obtidas usando os dois dispositivos. Resultados: IOLMaster 500 e Pentacam HR diferiram quanto à média de ceratometria (D 0,07 ± 0,03 D; p=0,0065) e profundidade de câmara anterior (D 0,08 ± 0,01 mm; p<0,001). Na análise da covariância, as seguintes diferenças foram obtidas usando a fórmula de Haigis quando confrontadas com os valores biométricos obtidos pela inserção dos valores de ceratometria e profundidade de câmara anterior, respectivamente: Penta/IOL x IOL/Penta (0,13 ± 0,03; p<0,0001); Penta/Penta x IOL/Penta (0,13 ± 0,03; p<0,0001); Penta/IOL x IOL/IOL (0,11 ± 0,03; p=0,001); Penta/Penta x IOL/IOL (0,11 ± 0,03; p=0,002); IOL/IOL x IOL/Penta (0,02 ± 0,03; p=0,865); Penta/IOL x Penta/Penta (0,002 ± 0,03; p=0,99). A diferença foi menor ao medir a profundidade da câmara anterior usando o IOLMaster 500, independentemente de qual dispositivo foi usado para medir a ceratometria. Conclusões: O Pentacam HR diferiu significativamente do IOLMaster 500 no cálculo de ceratometria. Quanto à profundidade da câmara anterior, os dois dispositivos foram igualmente precisos.

A comparative evaluation of visual, refractive, and patient-reported outcomes of three diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses

@#OBJECTIVE: To compare the visual, refractive, and patient-reported outcomes of eyes implanted with one of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, comparative, non-interventional study wherein subjects implanted with FineVision Micro F, AT LISA tri 839MP or AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal IOL after phacoemulsification were recruited. Manifest refraction, uncorrected and corrected visual acuity (VA) at distance, intermediate and near vision, contrast sensitivity, modulated transfer function (MTF) values and questionnaire answers were compared among the 3 groups using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Fifty-seven (57) eyes were included in the study: 21 eyes with FineVision (group A), 21 eyes with LISA tri (group B), and 15 eyes with PanOptix IOL (group C). The post-operative mean manifest spherical equivalent was -0.01D, -0.07D, and 0.05D, respectively (p=0.083). Uncorrected distance VA and best-corrected distance VA were similar among the groups. Groups A and C had better uncorrected and corrected intermediate VA at 80 cm and at 60 cm compared to group B. Group A had significantly better uncorrected near visual acuity than groups B and C (p=0.032). Mesopic contrast sensitivity testing showed group C had higher contrast sensitivities without glare in at the spatial frequency of 6 CPD (p=0.038) and with glare at 3 CPD (p=0.039) and at 12 CPD (p=0.009). MTF average height analysis showed that the group A had significantly superior resolution in far targets compared to groups B and C (p=0.001). At near targets, groups A and C had better resolutions compared to group B (p=0.017). There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction for far, intermediate and near VA among the groups. CONCLUSION: Eyes implanted with any of the 3 trifocal IOL designs achieved excellent uncorrected and bestcorrected distance, intermediate and near vision. FineVision and PanOptix provided significantly better intermediate vision than LISA tri at both 80 cm and 60 cm testing distance. FineVision had better near visual outcomes than PanOptix and LISA tri. Patient satisfaction was high in all 3 trifocal IOLS

A new device for intraocular lenses explantation

Intraocular lenses (IOLs) used in cataract surgery sometimes have to be explanted because of eventual complications like incorrect power, dysphotopsia, opacification, or rupture during implantation. However, current explantation procedures present several shortcomings related to the need for incision enlargement and/or potential damage to ocular structures. We present a new device which increases safety while cutting the lens, allowing the explantation through the original incision, and applicable to any type of IOL.

Surgical treatment of presbyopia II

This review gives an overview of the current multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) landscape, in terms of the technology, benefits, and limitations of different premium IOLs, as well as significant clinical outcomes. Cataract is the most common cause of visual impairment in older adults. From 1980, the number of blind and visually impaired people have decreased due to cataract surgery. As the number of surgical procedures increases every year, patient demands have also changed with many patients expecting excellent visual acuity without glasses. Multifocal IOLs can provide spectacle-independence for near, intermediate, and distant vision tasks. Multifocal IOLs can be classified into bifocal, trifocal, and extended depth of focus multifocal IOLs. The ultimate goal of multifocal lenses includes reduced incidence of photic phenomena, and improved uncorrected near, intermediate, and far visual acuities for those working with computers and smartphones, as well as no contrast sensitivity loss. Although some patients have issues with halos and glare, overall patient satisfaction and quality of life are generally high after multifocal IOL implantation. Careful patient selection should be made to satisfy different individual needs.

Comparison of the visual performance of multifocal intraocular lens and monofocal intraocular lens / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

@#AIM: To compare the visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and visual quality of cataract patients after the implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP multifocal intraocular lenses and CT SPHERIS 209M monofocal intraocular lenses.<p>METHODS: Fifty-two patients(52 eyes)were involved and divided into two groups in the study. The trail group(26 patients, 26 eyes)received AT LISA tri 839MP multifocal intraocular lens implantation and the control group(26 patients, 26 eyes)received CT SPHERIS 209M monofocal intraocular lens implantation after phacoemulsification. Visual acuity, contrast sensivity at different spatial frequencies(3, 6, 12, 18c/d)in bright and dark circumstances and patient satisfaction questionnaire were monitored at 3mo postoperatively. The postoperative visual acuity included the information of uncorrected distance visual acuity(UCDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity(UCIVA), best corrected distance visual acuity(BCDVA), distance corrected intermediate visual acuity(DCIVA)and distance corrected near visual acuity(DCNVA).<p>RESULTS: The UCIVA, UCNVA, DCIVA, DCNVA, independent spectacles ratio and satisfaction of the trail group were better than those of the control group 3mo postoper atire(<i>P</i><0.05). Mean contrast sensitivity at the spatial frequency of 18c/d in dark circumstances of the control group was higher than that of the trail group(<i>P</i>=0.041). The incidence of glare and halo showed no significantly statistical difference between the two groups(<i>P</i>=0.668).<p>CONCLUSION: AT LISA tri 839MP multifocal intraocular lens provided better intermediate and near visual acuity, independent spectacles ratio and satisfaction compared with CT SPHERIS 209M monofocal intraocular lens.

Accuracy of Predicting Refractive Outcomes Using Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography in Nuclear Cataracts

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of predicting refractive outcomes of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry (ARGOS; Movu Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) in nuclear cataracts. METHODS: A total of 107 eyes (107 nuclear cataract patients) were analyzed. Subjects were divided into three groups according to the maximum nuclear density of Pentacam HR (A, lower tertile; B, medium tertile; C, upper tertile). The keratometry and axial length measured by IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) and ARGOS systems were compared for each group. The correlation between maximum nuclear density and axial length difference readings from the two instruments was evaluated. The mean absolute error between the predicted refraction and 2-month post-operative refraction was compared. RESULTS: The maximum nuclear densities were 28.31 ± 7.30, 51.37 ± 7.82, and 88.63 ± 11.23 for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The axial length measured by ARGOS was significantly longer than that obtained using IOLMaster for groups B and C (respectively, p = 0.035, p < 0.001). A significantly positive correlation was found between the maximum nuclear density and axial length difference of the two devices (p < 0.001). Mean absolute errors were not significantly different between IOLMaster and ARGOS in group A. However, in groups B and C, the mean absolute error using ARGOS (0.31 ± 0.22 D and 0.32 ± 0.20 D, respectively) was significantly lower than that of IOLMaster (0.43 ± 0.21 D and 0.50 ± 0.26 D, respectively) (Group B, p = 0.027; Group C, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Even in dense nuclear cataracts, accurate refractive outcome prediction was possible using swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry.

Clinical outcomes of currently available multifocal intraocular lenses

This study investigates the characteristics and clinical outcomes of different types of extended depth-of-focus and multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) to determine which IOL can increase patient satisfaction. Modern cataract surgery has undergone tremendous evolution in terms of IOL quality. Recently, different types of presbyopia-correcting IOLs have become commercially available. Among them, multifocal IOLs are the most frequently used. Multifocal IOLs are different from conventional monofocal IOLs because these have multiple focus, which enable patients to see both distant and near objects at the same time. Multifocal IOLs can be classified as either refractive or diffractive IOLs. Diffractive multifocal IOLs include traditional bifocal lenses and relatively new trifocal lenses, and are the most widely used multifocal IOLs owing to their good clinical performance. Trifocal IOLs have an advantage over bifocal IOLs in terms of intermediate visual acuity, but can cause decreased contrast sensitivity and night vision disturbances. Recently developed extended depth-of-focus IOLs are different from traditional multifocal IOLs in that these extend the focus, resulting in smooth continuous focus. It also has the benefit of better contrast sensitivity and improved visual quality over multifocal IOLs; however, is relatively weak in terms of near visual acuity.

Cataract Surgery Practices in the Republic of Korea: A Survey of the Korean Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2018

PURPOSE: To describe current cataract surgery practice patterns and changing trends among Korean ophthalmologists. METHODS: A survey of members of the Korean Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery was performed in July 2018. One hundred and two (12.7%) of 801 questionnaires were returned for analysis. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and compared with previous surveys. RESULTS: Most of the respondents (75%) had been in practice for 6 or more years and performed an average of 31 cataract surgeries per month. The preferred method for cataract surgery was phacoemulsification (95%); 5% used a femtosecond laser. The use of topical anesthesia markedly increased from 69% (2012) to 80% (2018). The use of optical biometry exceeded that of ultrasound A-scan biometry. A multifocal intraocular lens was used by 76% of the respondents compared with 44% of the respondents in 2012. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used by 70% of the respondents postoperatively. Most (59%) of these anti-inflammatory drugs were prescribed for 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provided a comprehensive update of the present cataract surgery practices in the Republic of Korea. The results emphasized the increasing use of premium intraocular lenses, optical biometry, and topical anesthesia.

Effects of Bifocal versus Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation on Visual Quality after Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of bifocal versus trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation on visual quality after phacoemulsification in patients with cataracts. METHODS: Eighty-eight eyes from 63 patients were analyzed. Trifocal (AT LISA tri 839MP), bifocal (AcrySof IQ ReSTOR) and bifocal (Tecnis MF ZLB00) IOLs were implanted into 53, 18, and 17 eyes, respectively. Uncorrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, refractive errors, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction were measured at 1 week and 1 month after surgery. Refractive error was converted to a spherical equivalent and compared to predicted refraction calculated by IOL calculation formulas. RESULTS: Uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity did not differ significantly between groups. One month after surgery, the mean refractive errors were −0.07 diopters (D) in the AT LISA tri 839MP group, +0.18 D in the AcrySof IQ ReSTOR group, and +0.31 D in the Tecnis MF ZLB00 group (p < 0.001). The predictive accuracy of IOL calculation formulas did not differ between groups. Contrast sensitivity, satisfaction, and spectacle independence in the trifocal group were comparable with those of the two bifocal groups. CONCLUSIONS: Trifocal IOL and two different types of bifocal IOL implantation were all effective for improving visual quality, although refractive error in patients with trifocal IOL shows myopic tendencies.